busybox/debianutils/Makefile.in

# Makefile for busybox
#
# Copyright (C) 1999-2004 by Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
# General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
#

DEBIANUTILS_AR:=debianutils.a
ifndef $(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)
DEBIANUTILS_DIR:=$(top_builddir)/debianutils/
endif
srcdir=$(top_srcdir)/debianutils

DEBIANUTILS-y:=
DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_MKTEMP)		+= mktemp.o
DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_PIPE_PROGRESS)	+= pipe_progress.o
DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_READLINK)		+= readlink.o
DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_RUN_PARTS)		+= run_parts.o
DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_START_STOP_DAEMON)	+= start_stop_daemon.o
DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_WHICH)		+= which.o

libraries-y+=$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)$(DEBIANUTILS_AR)

$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)$(DEBIANUTILS_AR): $(patsubst %,$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)%, $(DEBIANUTILS-y))
	$(AR) -ro $@ $(patsubst %,$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)%, $(DEBIANUTILS-y))

$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)%.o: $(srcdir)/%.c
	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
Move readlink, mktemp, run-parts and which to a new debianutils dir. 2002-11-11 08:30:12 +05:30			`# Makefile for busybox`
			`#`
Remove trailing whitespace. Update copyright to include 2004. 2004-03-15 13:59:22 +05:30			`# Copyright (C) 1999-2004 by Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>`
Move readlink, mktemp, run-parts and which to a new debianutils dir. 2002-11-11 08:30:12 +05:30			`#`
			`# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify`
			`# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by`
			`# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or`
			`# (at your option) any later version.`
			`#`
			`# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,`
			`# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of`
			`# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU`
			`# General Public License for more details.`
			`#`
			`# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License`
			`# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software`
			`# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA`
			`#`

			`DEBIANUTILS_AR:=debianutils.a`
			`ifndef $(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)`
egor duda writes: Hi! I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6. That is, one runs command like 'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options' and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists. I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing is needed at all to whether it coded properly. 'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that. One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first. egor 2004-10-08 13:16:08 +05:30			`DEBIANUTILS_DIR:=$(top_builddir)/debianutils/`
Move readlink, mktemp, run-parts and which to a new debianutils dir. 2002-11-11 08:30:12 +05:30			`endif`
egor duda writes: Hi! I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6. That is, one runs command like 'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options' and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists. I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing is needed at all to whether it coded properly. 'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that. One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first. egor 2004-10-08 13:16:08 +05:30			`srcdir=$(top_srcdir)/debianutils`
Move readlink, mktemp, run-parts and which to a new debianutils dir. 2002-11-11 08:30:12 +05:30
			`DEBIANUTILS-y:=`
			`DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_MKTEMP) += mktemp.o`
NEW APPLET: pipe_progress, used by debian installer 2003-11-14 15:34:33 +05:30			`DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_PIPE_PROGRESS) += pipe_progress.o`
Move readlink, mktemp, run-parts and which to a new debianutils dir. 2002-11-11 08:30:12 +05:30			`DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_READLINK) += readlink.o`
			`DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_RUN_PARTS) += run_parts.o`
Move start_stop_daemon to debianutils. Cleanup run_parts a bit and add long opts 2003-07-26 14:46:00 +05:30			`DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_START_STOP_DAEMON) += start_stop_daemon.o`
Move readlink, mktemp, run-parts and which to a new debianutils dir. 2002-11-11 08:30:12 +05:30			`DEBIANUTILS-$(CONFIG_WHICH) += which.o`

			`libraries-y+=$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)$(DEBIANUTILS_AR)`

			`$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)$(DEBIANUTILS_AR): $(patsubst %,$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)%, $(DEBIANUTILS-y))`
			`$(AR) -ro $@ $(patsubst %,$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)%, $(DEBIANUTILS-y))`

egor duda writes: Hi! I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6. That is, one runs command like 'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options' and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists. I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing is needed at all to whether it coded properly. 'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that. One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first. egor 2004-10-08 13:16:08 +05:30			`$(DEBIANUTILS_DIR)%.o: $(srcdir)/%.c`
			`$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<`