emo/busybox
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Larry Doolittle writes:

Browse Source 
This is a bulk spelling fix patch against busybox-1.00-pre10.
If anyone gets a corrupted copy (and cares), let me know and
I will make alternate arrangements.

Erik - please apply.

Authors - please check that I didn't corrupt any meaning.

Package importers - see if any of these changes should be
passed to the upstream authors.

I glossed over lots of sloppy capitalizations, missing apostrophes,
mixed American/British spellings, and German-style compound words.

What is "pretect redefined for test" in cmdedit.c?

Good luck on the 1.00 release!

      - Larry
This commit is contained in:
Eric Andersen
2004-04-14 17:51:38 +00:00
parent 4c8b0dd973
commit aff114c33d
70 changed files with 170 additions and 170 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
modutils/insmod.c
View File

@ -282,11 +282,11 @@ extern int insmod_ng_main( int argc, char **argv);
#ifndef MODUTILS_MODULE_H
static const int MODUTILS_MODULE_H = 1;
#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.116 2004/04/06 11:56:26 andersen Exp $"
#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.117 2004/04/14 17:51:22 andersen Exp $"
/* This file contains the structures used by the 2.0 and 2.1 kernels.
We do not use the kernel headers directly because we do not wish
to be dependant on a particular kernel version to compile insmod. */
to be dependent on a particular kernel version to compile insmod. */
/*======================================================================*/
@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ int delete_module(const char *);
#ifndef MODUTILS_OBJ_H
static const int MODUTILS_OBJ_H = 1;
#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.116 2004/04/06 11:56:26 andersen Exp $"
#ident "$Id: insmod.c,v 1.117 2004/04/14 17:51:22 andersen Exp $"
/* The relocatable object is manipulated using elfin types. */
@ -2597,8 +2597,8 @@ new_process_module_arguments(struct obj_file *f, int argc, char **argv)
str = alloca(r - q + 1);
memcpy(str, q, r - q);
/* I don't know if it is usefull, as the previous case
doesn't null terminate the string ??? */
/* I don't know if it is useful, as the previous case
doesn't nul terminate the string ??? */
str[r - q] = '\0';
/* Keep next fields */