From beea4b80213303de40e4b68ee06963fca3972eaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:42:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] - some more markup fixes
---
docs/busybox.net/FAQ.html | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/busybox.net/FAQ.html b/docs/busybox.net/FAQ.html
index dc673872d..aa2a5f772 100644
--- a/docs/busybox.net/FAQ.html
+++ b/docs/busybox.net/FAQ.html
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ have additions to this FAQ document, we would love to add them,
Which architectures does BusyBox run on?
Which C libraries are supported?
Can I include BusyBox as part of the software on my device?
-Where can I find other small utilities since busybox does not include the features I want?
+Where can I find other small utilities since busybox does not include the features I want?
I demand that you to add <favorite feature> right now! How come you don't answer all my questions on the mailing list instantly? I demand that you help me with all of my problems Right Now!
I need help with BusyBox! What should I do?
I need you to add <favorite feature>! Are the BusyBox developers willing to be paid in order to fix bugs or add in <favorite feature>? Are you willing to provide support contracts?
@@ -40,23 +40,25 @@ have additions to this FAQ document, we would love to add them,
- What are the goals of busybox?
- What is the design of busybox?
- - How is the source code organized?
-
+
- I want to make busybox even smaller, how do I go about it?
- Adding an applet to busybox
- What standards does busybox adhere to?
- Portability.
- - Tips and tricks.
-
+
- Who are the BusyBox developers?
@@ -376,7 +378,7 @@ within each applet. More build coverage testing.
-
+
Variants of this one get asked a lot.
@@ -385,7 +387,7 @@ and we're happy to respond to our users' needs. But if you're coming to the
list for free tech support we're going to ask you to upgrade to a current
version before we try to diagnose your problem.
-If you're building BusyBox 0.50 with uClibc 0.9.19 and gcc 0.9.26 there's a
+
If you're building BusyBox 0.50 with uClibc 0.9.19 and gcc 1.27 there's a
fairly large chance that whatever problem you're seeing has already been fixed.
To get that fix, all you have to do is upgrade to a newer version. If you
don't at least _try_ that, you're wasting our time.
@@ -775,9 +777,9 @@ successor to ibcs2: the 86open
project. That project disbanded in 1999 with the endorsement of an
existing standard: Linux ELF binaries. Since then, the major players at the
time (such as AIX, Solaris, and
-FreeBSD)
+href="http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/aix/products/aixos/linux/index.html">AIX, Solaris, and
+FreeBSD)
have all either grown Linux support or folded.
The major exceptions are newcomer MacOS X, some embedded environments