update NOFORK_NOEXEC.lst
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6390ed77e
commit
c3e60e1e9a
@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ hd - noexec. runner
|
||||
hdparm - hardware
|
||||
head - noexec. runner
|
||||
hexdump - noexec. runner
|
||||
hexedit - interactive, longterm
|
||||
hostid - NOFORK
|
||||
hostname - noexec. talks to network (hostname -d may query DNS)
|
||||
httpd - daemon
|
||||
@ -235,6 +236,7 @@ md5sum - noexec. runner
|
||||
mdev - daemon
|
||||
mesg - NOFORK
|
||||
microcom - interactive, longterm
|
||||
minips - noexec
|
||||
mkdir - NOFORK
|
||||
mkdosfs - needs ^C
|
||||
mke2fs - needs ^C
|
||||
@ -264,6 +266,7 @@ nmeter - longterm
|
||||
nohup - noexec. spawner
|
||||
nproc - NOFORK
|
||||
ntpd - daemon
|
||||
nuke - noexec
|
||||
od - runner
|
||||
openvt - longterm: spawns a child and waits for it
|
||||
partprobe - noexec. leaks: open+ioctl_or_perror_and_die(BLKRRPART)
|
||||
@ -300,6 +303,7 @@ remove-shell - noexec. leaks: open+xfunc
|
||||
renice - noexec. nofork candidate(uses getpwnam, is that ok?)
|
||||
reset - noexec. spawner (execs "stty")
|
||||
resize - noexec. changes state (signal handlers)
|
||||
resume - noexec
|
||||
rev - runner
|
||||
rm - noexec. rm -i interactive
|
||||
rmdir - NOFORK
|
||||
@ -308,6 +312,7 @@ route - talks to network (may query DNS to convert IPs to names)
|
||||
rpm - runner
|
||||
rpm2cpio - runner
|
||||
rtcwake - longterm: puts system to sleep, optimizing this for speed is pointless
|
||||
run-init - spawner, rare, changes state (oh yes), execing may be important to free binary's inode
|
||||
run-parts - longterm
|
||||
runlevel - noexec. can be nofork if "endutxent()" is called unconditionally, but too rare to bother?
|
||||
runsv - daemon
|
||||
@ -320,6 +325,7 @@ sendmail - runner
|
||||
seq - noexec. runner
|
||||
setarch - noexec. spawner
|
||||
setconsole - noexec
|
||||
setfattr - noexec
|
||||
setfont - noexec. leaks a lot of stuff
|
||||
setkeycodes - noexec
|
||||
setlogcons - noexec
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user