Re-wordwrap the new tests, and fix seq.c to pass them.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a345dc855f
commit
d5b9428bb6
@ -29,13 +29,11 @@ int seq_main(int argc, char **argv)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* You should note that this is pos-5.0.91 semantics, -- FK. */
|
/* You should note that this is pos-5.0.91 semantics, -- FK. */
|
||||||
if (first <= last ? increment > 0 : increment < 0) {
|
for (i = first;
|
||||||
for (i = first;
|
(increment > 0 && i <= last) || (increment < 0 && i >=last);
|
||||||
(first <= last) ? (i <= last) : (i >= last);
|
i += increment)
|
||||||
i += increment)
|
{
|
||||||
{
|
printf("%g\n", i);
|
||||||
printf("%g\n", i);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
|
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
|
||||||
|
@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ testing "seq one argument" "seq 3" "1\n2\n3\n" "" ""
|
|||||||
testing "seq two arguments" "seq 5 7" "5\n6\n7\n" "" ""
|
testing "seq two arguments" "seq 5 7" "5\n6\n7\n" "" ""
|
||||||
testing "seq two arguments reversed" "seq 7 5" "" "" ""
|
testing "seq two arguments reversed" "seq 7 5" "" "" ""
|
||||||
testing "seq two arguments equal" "seq 3 3" "3\n" "" ""
|
testing "seq two arguments equal" "seq 3 3" "3\n" "" ""
|
||||||
# test negative non-null step
|
testing "seq two arguments equal, arbitrary negative step" "seq 1 -15 1" \
|
||||||
testing "seq two arguments equal, arbitrary negative step" "seq 1 -15 1" "1\n" "" ""
|
"1\n" "" ""
|
||||||
# test positive non-null step
|
testing "seq two arguments equal, arbitrary positive step" "seq 1 +15 1" \
|
||||||
testing "seq two arguments equal, arbitrary positive step" "seq 1 +15 1" "1\n" "" ""
|
"1\n" "" ""
|
||||||
testing "seq count up by 2" "seq 4 2 8" "4\n6\n8\n" "" ""
|
testing "seq count up by 2" "seq 4 2 8" "4\n6\n8\n" "" ""
|
||||||
testing "seq count down by 2" "seq 8 -2 4" "8\n6\n4\n" "" ""
|
testing "seq count down by 2" "seq 8 -2 4" "8\n6\n4\n" "" ""
|
||||||
testing "seq count wrong way #1" "seq 4 -2 8" "" "" ""
|
testing "seq count wrong way #1" "seq 4 -2 8" "" "" ""
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user