type on the way out, but the signal handler didn't exit. Plus it did
unnecessary things with sigaction. This code is overgrown and needs a serious
weed-whacking...
* CPU% = process[i].ticks/sum(process[i].ticks) * busy_cpu_ticks/total_cpu_ticks
* got rid of empty line under "Load average" line
and used last line - +2 visible processes
* do not do float conversion of loadavg, just read it as string from /proc
* fix display on small screens
* dropped unused .stime, .utime fields
* a few variables were renamed
* style fixes
This is a bulk spelling fix patch against busybox-1.00-pre10.
If anyone gets a corrupted copy (and cares), let me know and
I will make alternate arrangements.
Erik - please apply.
Authors - please check that I didn't corrupt any meaning.
Package importers - see if any of these changes should be
passed to the upstream authors.
I glossed over lots of sloppy capitalizations, missing apostrophes,
mixed American/British spellings, and German-style compound words.
What is "pretect redefined for test" in cmdedit.c?
Good luck on the 1.00 release!
- Larry
Erik,
The format for /proc/meminfo has changed between 2.4 and 2.6, quite considerably.
In addition to the removal of the two-line summary that was present in 2.4,
MemShared was also removed. Presently (at least in busybox CVS HEAD), top fails
to parse this correctly and spews forth a:
top: failed to read 'meminfo'
message. This patch switches around some of the semantics a little to do sane
parsing for both 2.4 and 2.6. Also, in the event that the summary gets yanked
from 2.4, this patch will deal with that as well. With this patch, I'm able
to run top correctly on 2.6.0-test7 (tested on sh).
Please apply.
procps/top.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Ok. I generate patch for include to busybox-devel my work with
top (original author give me maintaining) and telnetd (my
support and unofficial maintaining) applets. Docs changes
also: added awk, netstat, time applets to list ;)
