messages, C) can show the current association (if any) when called
with only one argument. Update the documentation a lot too.
Remind me to add a test suite for this thing. I think I've figured out
how to handle root-only testsuites...
chunk of data when they get it and not block until they've buffered 4k.
The use case was cat /proc/psaux, but you can also reproduce this by
running non-busybox cat by itself and typing things at the command line.
Then run busybox cat. Notice how cat is _supposed_ to echo each line back
to us as we hit enter?
find_root_device.c. (We #include it in busybox.h but not libbb.h, it seems.
Someday, someone's going to have to clarify for me the difference between
those two...)
- new bb_getopt_ulflags features: check max and min args, convert first argv to options special for ar and tar applets
- use bb_default_error_retval for env applet
- more long opt compatibility, can set flag for long opt struct now
- more logic: check opt-depend requires and global requires, special for 'id' and 'start-stop-daemon' applets.
appended to an executable that's being run (yes, I'm doing this) you get
EPERM, but mounting readonly fixes it. Doing the fallback all the time
shouldn't hurt, and is one less test.
- change llist_add_to_end as proposed by vodz in http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2005-September/016411.html
- remove unneeded includes, add short boilerplate and copyright to llist.c
- move COMM_LEN from find_pid_by_name to libbb.h and use it in procps_status_t
- add reverse_pidlist() to find_pid_by_name. Will be needed for pidof.
as far as I can tell, are no longer relevant. Modern busybox refuses to
build under libc5 (there's a specific test and #error for that), and
I'm not sure building against 2.1 kernel headers on Alpha was ever relevant.
I'm happy to put any of this back if anybody can point to a real need for it,
but if so we need to specifically document what environment is being
compensated for. (And we should quarrantine the build environment code
into one place, anyway. Maybe "quirks.h" for known compiler and
libc quirks?)
