Thomas Frauendorfer 2bbd1e1e8a Fix off by one error in FAT16 <=> FAT32 detection ... cluster_count is compared against FAT16_MAX, which is defined as 0xfff4 That is the maximum number of cluster a FAT16 can have. For reference also check the hardware whitepaper from Microsoft FAT: General Overview of On-Disk Format, version 1.03 page 15 Signed-off-by: Thomas Frauendorfer <tf@miray.de> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>		2019-03-15 09:57:24 +01:00
..
bcache.c
btrfs.c
Config.src
cramfs.c
exfat.c
ext.c
f2fs.c
fat.c
get_devname.c
hfs.c
iso9660.c
jfs.c
Kbuild.src
lfs.c
linux_raid.c
linux_swap.c
luks.c
minix.c
nilfs.c
ntfs.c
ocfs2.c
reiserfs.c
romfs.c
squashfs.c
sysv.c
ubifs.c
udf.c
unused_highpoint.c
unused_hpfs.c
unused_isw_raid.c
unused_lsi_raid.c
unused_lvm.c
unused_mac.c
unused_msdos.c
unused_nvidia_raid.c
unused_promise_raid.c
unused_silicon_raid.c
unused_ufs.c
unused_via_raid.c
util.c
volume_id_internal.h
volume_id.c
xfs.c