busybox/runit
Alistair Francis ad27d44ebe runsv: Use 64 prefix syscall if we have to
Some 32-bit architectures no longer have the 32-bit time_t syscalls.
Instead they have suffixed syscalls that returns a 64-bit time_t. If
the architecture doesn't have the non-suffixed syscall and is using a
64-bit time_t let's use the suffixed syscall instead.

This fixes build issues when building for RISC-V 32-bit with 5.1+ kernel
headers.

If an architecture only supports the suffixed syscalls, but is still
using a 32-bit time_t report a compilation error. This avoids us have to
deal with converting between 64-bit and 32-bit values. There are
currently no architectures where this is the case.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
2019-10-08 16:31:54 +02:00
..
chpst.c libbb: reduce the overhead of single parameter bb_error_msg() calls 2019-07-02 11:35:03 +02:00
Config.src
Kbuild.src
runit_lib.h
runsv.c runsv: Use 64 prefix syscall if we have to 2019-10-08 16:31:54 +02:00
runsvdir.c config: update size information 2018-12-28 03:20:17 +01:00
sv.c config: update size information 2018-12-28 03:20:17 +01:00
svlogd.c libbb: reduce the overhead of single parameter bb_error_msg() calls 2019-07-02 11:35:03 +02:00