fix some inconsistencies in the tagging examples
This commit is contained in:
parent
75e86914aa
commit
71e4577367
20
README.md
20
README.md
@ -643,38 +643,38 @@ reuse after a certain number of allocation cycles. Similarly to the initial tag
|
||||
generation, tag values for adjacent allocations will be skipped by incrementing
|
||||
past them.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, consider this slab of allocations that are not yet used with 16
|
||||
For example, consider this slab of allocations that are not yet used with 15
|
||||
representing the tag for free memory. For the sake of simplicity, there will be
|
||||
no quarantine or other slabs for this example:
|
||||
|
||||
| 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
|
||||
| 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
|
||||
|
||||
Three slots are randomly chosen for allocations, with random tags assigned (2,
|
||||
15, 7) since these slots haven't ever been used and don't have saved values:
|
||||
7, 14) since these slots haven't ever been used and don't have saved values:
|
||||
|
||||
| 16 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 16 |
|
||||
| 15 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 15 |
|
||||
|
||||
The 2nd allocation slot is freed, and is set back to the tag for free memory
|
||||
(16), but with the previous tag value stored in the freed space:
|
||||
(15), but with the previous tag value stored in the freed space:
|
||||
|
||||
| 16 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
|
||||
| 15 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 15 |
|
||||
|
||||
The first slot is allocated for the first time, receiving the random value 3:
|
||||
|
||||
| 3 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
|
||||
| 3 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 15 |
|
||||
|
||||
The 2nd slot is randomly chosen again, so the previous tag (2) is retrieved and
|
||||
incremented to 3 as part of the use-after-free mitigation. An adjacent
|
||||
allocation already uses the tag 3, so the tag is further incremented to 4 (it
|
||||
would be incremented to 5 if one of the adjacent tags was 4):
|
||||
|
||||
| 3 | 4 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
|
||||
| 3 | 4 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 15 |
|
||||
|
||||
The last slot is randomly chosen for the next alocation, and is assigned the
|
||||
random value 15. However, it's placed next to an allocation with the tag 15 so
|
||||
random value 14. However, it's placed next to an allocation with the tag 14 so
|
||||
the tag is incremented and wraps around to 0:
|
||||
|
||||
| 3 | 4 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 0 |
|
||||
| 3 | 4 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
## API extensions
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user