77af1d81fe
restricting use unnecessarily, and simple attribution is fine.
333 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
333 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
ndhc + ifchd, Copyright (C) 2004-2011 Nicholas J. Kain.
|
|
See LICENSE for licensing information. In short: Two-clause / New BSD.
|
|
|
|
Requirements:
|
|
|
|
Linux kernel
|
|
GNU Make (tested: 3.82) or CMake (tested: 2.8)
|
|
libcap (available via ftp.kernel.org)
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
ndhc consists of a set of daemons that cooperate in order to provide
|
|
privilege-seperated dhcp client services. Each daemon runs with the minimal
|
|
necessary privileges in order to perform its task. Currently, ndhc consists of
|
|
two daemons: the eponymous ndhc and ifchd.
|
|
|
|
ndhc communicates with dhcp servers and handles the vagaries of the dhcp
|
|
client protocol. It runs as a non-root user inside a chroot. ndhc retains
|
|
only the minimum necessary set of privileges required to perform its duties.
|
|
These powers include the ability to bind to a low port, the ability to open a
|
|
raw socket, and the ability to communicate on broadcast channels. ndhc holds
|
|
no other powers and is restricted to a chroot that contains nothing more than a
|
|
domain socket filesystem object and a urandom device node.
|
|
|
|
ifchd handles interface change requests. It listens on a UNIX domain socket
|
|
for such requests, and denies any client that does not match an authorized gid,
|
|
uid, or pid. ifchd runs as a non-root user inside a chroot, and retains only
|
|
the power to configure network interfaces. ifchd is designed so that it has
|
|
the ability to service multiple client requests simultaneously; a single ifchd
|
|
is sufficient for multiple ndhc clients. Only exotic setups should require
|
|
this functionality, but it does exist.
|
|
|
|
Note that ndhc does not support the entire DHCP client protocol. Notably, DHCP
|
|
options concatenation and IPv4 Link Local Addressing as defined in RFC3927 are
|
|
not and will not be supported.
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, ndhc fully implements RFC5227's address conflict detection
|
|
and defense. Great care is taken to ensure that address conflicts will be
|
|
detected, and ndhc also has extensive support for address defense. Care is
|
|
taken to prevent unintentional ARP flooding under any circumstance.
|
|
|
|
ndhc also monitors hardware link status via netlink events and reacts
|
|
appropriately when interface carrier status changes or an interface is
|
|
explicitly deconfigured. This functionality can be useful on wired networks
|
|
when transient carrier downtimes occur (or cables are changed), but it is
|
|
particularly useful on wireless networks.
|
|
|
|
FEATURES
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
Privilege-seperated. Neither ifchd or ndhc runs as full root, and capabilities
|
|
are divided between the programs. Both programs run in a chroot.
|
|
|
|
Robust. ndhc performs no runtime heap allocations -- malloc() is never called
|
|
(and neither is brk(), mmap(), etc), and ndhc never performs recursive calls
|
|
and only stack-allocates fixed-length types, so stack depth is bounded, too.
|
|
ifchd lightly uses malloc(), but no heap allocations have long lifetimes, and
|
|
are bounded from being large.
|
|
|
|
Active defense of IP address and IP collision avoidance. ndhc fully implements
|
|
RFC5227. It is capable of both a normal level of tenacity in defense, where
|
|
it will eventually back off and request a new lease if a peer won't relent
|
|
in the case of a conflict, and of relentlessly defending a lease forever. In
|
|
either mode, it rate-limits defense messages, so it can't be tricked into
|
|
flooding by a hostile peer or DHCP server, either.
|
|
|
|
Small. Both ndhc and ifchd avoid unnecessary outside dependencies and are
|
|
written in plain C. The only library used is libcap, as the raw raw kernel API
|
|
for capabilities is not guaranteed to stay stable.
|
|
|
|
Fast. ndhc filters input using the BPF/LPF mechanism so that uninteresting
|
|
packets are dropped by the operating system before ndhc even sees the data.
|
|
ndhc also only listens to DHCP traffic when it's necessary.
|
|
|
|
Flexible. ndhc can request particular IPs, send user-specified client IDs,
|
|
write a file that contains the current lease IP, write PID files, etc. One
|
|
ifchd session can service multiple ndhc sessions.
|
|
|
|
Aware of the hardware link status. If you disconnect an interface on which
|
|
ndhc is providing dhcp service, it will be aware. When the link status
|
|
returns, ndhc will fingerprint the reconnected network and make sure that it
|
|
corresponds to the one on which it has a lease. If the new network is
|
|
different, it will forget about the old lease and request a new one.
|
|
|
|
USAGE
|
|
-----
|
|
|
|
1) Compile and install ifchd and ndhc.
|
|
a) gmake
|
|
b) Install the build/ifchd and build/ndhc executables in a normal place. I
|
|
would suggest /usr/sbin or /usr/local/sbin.
|
|
|
|
1alt) Compile and install ifchd and ndhc.
|
|
a) Create a build directory:
|
|
mkdir build && cd build
|
|
b) Create the makefiles:
|
|
cmake ..
|
|
c) Build ifchd and ndhc:
|
|
make
|
|
d) Install the ifchd/ifchd and ndhc/ndhc executables in a normal place. I
|
|
would suggest /usr/sbin or /usr/local/sbin.
|
|
|
|
2) Time to create the jail in which ifchd and ndhc will run.
|
|
a) Become root and create new group "ifchd".
|
|
|
|
$ su -
|
|
# umask 077
|
|
# groupadd ifchd
|
|
|
|
b) Create new users "ifchd" and "dhcp". The primary group of these
|
|
users should be "ifchd".
|
|
|
|
# useradd -d /var/lib/ndhc -s /sbin/nologin -g ifchd ifchd
|
|
# useradd -d /var/lib/ndhc -s /sbin/nologin -g ifchd dhcp
|
|
|
|
b) Create the jail directory and set its ownership properly.
|
|
|
|
# mkdir /var/lib/ndhc
|
|
# chown root.root /var/lib/ndhc
|
|
# chmod a+rx /var/lib/ndhc
|
|
# cd /var/lib/ndhc
|
|
# mkdir var
|
|
# mkdir var/state
|
|
# mkdir var/run
|
|
# chown -R ifchd.ifchd var
|
|
# chmod -R a+rx var
|
|
# chmod g+w var/run
|
|
|
|
c) Create a urandom device for ndhc to use within the jail.
|
|
|
|
# mkdir dev
|
|
# mknod dev/urandom c 1 9
|
|
# mknod dev/null c 1 3
|
|
# chown -R root.root dev
|
|
# chmod a+rx dev
|
|
# chmod a+r dev/urandom
|
|
# chmod a+rw dev/null
|
|
|
|
d) (optional) If you wish for logging to properly work, you
|
|
will need to properly configure your logging daemon so that it
|
|
opens a domain socket in the proper location within the jail.
|
|
Since this varies per-daemon, I cannot provide a general
|
|
configuration.
|
|
|
|
3) At this point the jail is usable; ifchd and ndhc are ready to
|
|
be used. As an example of a sample configuration, here is my
|
|
rc.dhcp:
|
|
|
|
--START--
|
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
case "$1" in
|
|
start)
|
|
ifchd -i wan0 -p /var/run/ifchd.pid -u ifchd -g ifchd -U dhcp \
|
|
-G ifchd -c /var/lib/ndhc &> /dev/null
|
|
ndhc -b -i wan0 -u dhcp -C /var/lib/ndhc &> /dev/null
|
|
;;
|
|
stop)
|
|
killall ndhc ifchd
|
|
;;
|
|
esac
|
|
|
|
--END--
|
|
|
|
This script works fine with my personal machines, which are set up
|
|
exactly as I have outlined above. If you have not entirely followed my
|
|
directions, the script will of course require modifications.
|
|
|
|
4o) If you encounter problems, I suggest running both ifchd and ndhc in the
|
|
foreground and examining the printed output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEHAVIOR NOTES
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
ifchd does not enable updates of the local hostname and resolv.conf by default.
|
|
If you wish to enable these functions, use the --resolve (-r) and --hostname
|
|
(-o) flags. See ifchd --help.
|
|
|
|
ifchd can be set such that it only allows clients to configure particular
|
|
network interfaces. The --interface (-i) argument does the trick, and may
|
|
be used multiple times to allow multiple interfaces.
|
|
|
|
PORTING NOTES
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
DHCP clients aren't naturally very portable. It's necessary to perform a lot
|
|
of tasks that are platform-specific. ndhc is rather platform-dependent, and it
|
|
extensively uses Linux-specific features. Some of these features are also
|
|
available on the BSDs.
|
|
|
|
1) Both ndhc and ifchd use the SO_PEERCRED flag of getsockopt() to discriminate
|
|
authorized connections by uid, gid, and pid. Similar functionality exists in
|
|
at least the BSDs; however, it has a different API.
|
|
|
|
2) ifchd takes advantage of Linux capabilities so that it does not need full
|
|
root privileges. Capabilities were a proposed POSIX feature that was not made
|
|
part of the official standard, so any implemention that may exist will be
|
|
system-dependent.
|
|
|
|
3) ifchd configures network interfaces and routes. Interface and route
|
|
configuration is entirely non-portable, usually requiring calls to the
|
|
catch-all ioctl(), or even more unusual mechanisms like netlink sockets.
|
|
|
|
4) ndhc uses netlink sockets extensively for both fetching data and hardware
|
|
link state change notification events.
|
|
|
|
5) ndhc uses the Berkeley Packet Filter / Linux Packet Filter interfaces to
|
|
drop unwanted packets in kernelspace. This functionality is available on
|
|
most modern unix systems, but it is not standard.
|
|
|
|
6) ndhc uses epoll() and signalfd(). These are Linux-specific.
|
|
|
|
7) Numerous socket options are used, and the AF_PACKET socket family is used
|
|
for raw sockets and ARP. These are largely Linux-specific, too.
|
|
|
|
8) ndhc uses strlcpy() and strlcat(). Native versions are provided.
|
|
Some standard C libraries include a native implementation of strlcpy() and
|
|
strlcat(). Such defines may conflict with my implementations in strl.c/strl.h.
|
|
It is up to the user whether the standard C library implementations should be
|
|
used. Note that some machines implement strlcpy() and strlcat() with
|
|
nonstandard semantics (notably Solaris). On these systems, using the
|
|
system-provided implementations may lead to security problems. Such problems
|
|
are the fault of the vendor. If you are unsure whether your system is correct
|
|
or not, I suggest using the implementation that I provide.
|
|
|
|
HISTORY
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
I started writing ndhc back in 2004. My ISP at the time required a dhcp
|
|
client for connection authentication, and I was not comfortable with any
|
|
of the existing clients, which all ran as root and had colorful security
|
|
histories. DHCP is generally not a routed protocol, and lacks real
|
|
authentication mechanisms in real world deployments (some largely
|
|
abandoned RFCs for such behavior do exist), so no program existed to
|
|
fill the niche of a truly secure DHCP client.
|
|
|
|
My router/server at the time ran a custom Linux distro that was designed
|
|
for extreme security. A root privileged DHCP client would be nearly the
|
|
only root-owned process running on the machine, so I was highly motivated
|
|
to develop an alternative.
|
|
|
|
ifchd was first written entirely from scratch. It did not take long to write,
|
|
since it is by design rather simple, and I was already familiar with
|
|
the quirks of Linux capabilities. That left me with the choice of adapting
|
|
an existing DHCP client or writing my own from scratch.
|
|
|
|
At the time, I just wanted something that would work, so my choice was to
|
|
adapt udhcpc to work with ifchd. udhcpc was chosen since it was intended to
|
|
be used with resource-constrained or embedded systems, and was thus very
|
|
small. ISC dhclient was another alternative, but it is an extremely large
|
|
program, and it would have been very hard to audit it for correctness.
|
|
|
|
udhcpc was not did not really fit my requirements well, since it was designed
|
|
to be small at all costs, sacrificing correctness when necessary. The code was
|
|
hard to follow, and had many quirks. Bounds-checking was rare, type aliasing
|
|
common, and state transitions were convoluted. Not all of the client was
|
|
asynchronous, and no precautions were taken against conflicting peers. ARP was
|
|
not used at all.
|
|
|
|
However, it was small. With a lot of work, I ripped out the script-calling
|
|
mechanisms and replaced them with ifchd requests. Bounds-checking was
|
|
aggressively (and somewhat hamfistedly) retrofitted into the code. It was
|
|
cleaned to a degree, and importantly it worked for connecting to my ISP.
|
|
|
|
Then I changed ISPs. My new ISP used PPPoE, not dhcp. Around the same time, I
|
|
also switched to using Gentoo rather than a hand-built distribution. I didn't
|
|
have time to maintain the old custom setup, and it was very hard keeping up
|
|
with library vulnerabilties in eg, zlib or openssl, and ensuring that all
|
|
installed binaries, dynamic and static, were updated. ndhc was abandoned for
|
|
many years. It wasn't needed on my server, and it was "too much effort" to
|
|
deviate from the stock distro dhcp clients on other machines.
|
|
|
|
Then, around 2008, I changed ISPs again. This time my new ISP used dhcp and
|
|
not PPPoE. So, after a few months, I decided to dust off the old ndhc/ifchd
|
|
project and adapt it to my modern standards and machines.
|
|
|
|
ifchd was in good shape and required little work. I ended up rewriting
|
|
ndhc. The only parts that remained from the original were the parts that
|
|
I had already rewritten before, and some of those were rewritten, too.
|
|
|
|
The end result is a modern DHCP client is largely RFC-compliant, except where
|
|
the RFCs dictate behavior that would be problematic, overly complex, useless,
|
|
or exploitable. DHCP is poorly specified, and real-world servers and clients
|
|
vary a lot from the RFCs, so these conditions are necessary for a useful
|
|
program.
|
|
|
|
Although ndhc's implementation and behavior are different, I have to credit
|
|
the idea of using netlink events to discover hardware link status transitions
|
|
to Stefan Rompf and his 'dhcpclient' program. The Linux netlink events that
|
|
are used are otherwise rather obscure and poorly documented, and I wouldn't
|
|
have known about them otherwise.
|
|
|
|
GRSECURITY NOTES
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Make sure that CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_CHROOT_CAPS is disabled. Otherwise, ifchd will
|
|
lose its capabilities (in particular, the ability to reconfigure interfaces)
|
|
when it chroots.
|
|
|
|
DHCP PROTOCOL QUIRKS
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Send a packet that has an options field set to:
|
|
'DHCP-OPTION-OVERLOAD:3'
|
|
Then in the file and sname fields:
|
|
'DHCP-OPTION-OVERLOAD:3'
|
|
I suspect some bad dhcp programs will hang given this input.
|
|
|
|
Options concatenation is a minefield of poor specification. There's a
|
|
follow-up RFC to make proper behavior somewhat more defined, but it's still
|
|
overly complex.
|
|
|
|
DHCP explicitly specifies that there is no minimum lease time and also
|
|
specifies that the minimum default rebinding time is leasetime*0.875 and
|
|
the minimum default renewing time is leasetime*0.500. All times are relative
|
|
to the instant when the lease is bound and are specified in seconds. Taken
|
|
together, this means that a client strictly implementing the RFC should
|
|
accept a lease that either is perpetually rebinding (lease == 1s) or instantly
|
|
expires (lease == 0s). ndhc ignores the RFC and specifies a minimum lease
|
|
time of one minute.
|
|
|
|
Renew and rebind times are optionally specified and may take on any value.
|
|
This means that a malicious server could demand a rebind time before a renew
|
|
time, or make these times ridiculously short, or specify both times past
|
|
that of the lease duration. ndhc avoids all of this nonsense by simply
|
|
ignoring these options and using the default values specified by the RFC.
|
|
|
|
There are other quirks, but these are just several interesting ones that
|
|
immediately occur to me while I'm writing this document.
|
|
|