emo/procps
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Activity
0696570a94
procps/README

49 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Adjusted makefiles for autotools
2002-05-16 06:56:47 +05:30
COMPATIBILITY
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
This code is intended for use with Linux 2.6.xx, 3.x and
hopefully all future kernels.
Adjusted makefiles for autotools
2002-05-16 06:56:47 +05:30
new (useful!) README
2002-10-07 02:43:52 +05:30
INSTALLATION
Adjusted makefiles for autotools
2002-05-16 06:56:47 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
If you are using git version of the project you need extra step.
no idea what :-)
2003-01-24 14:12:16 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
./autogen.sh
no idea what :-)
2003-01-24 14:12:16 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
After that, and everyone using .tar.xz version of procps-ng, can
do normal build. Read './configure --help' to select options for
your needs.
no idea what :-)
2003-01-24 14:12:16 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
./configure
make
make install
better control of odd install locations
2003-03-21 06:34:51 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
If you have DejaGNU installed you can run optional test suite.
x86-64 sucks
2003-10-23 09:11:58 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
make check
new packager guidelines
2004-07-17 20:55:45 +05:30
docs: add how to contribute to README Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:56:11 +05:30
HOW TO CONTRIBUTE
See Documentation/BUGS file.
new packager guidelines
2004-07-17 20:55:45 +05:30
PACKAGING
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
If you are a downstream maintainer (packager) for a Linux
distribution, please avoid causing troubles. This section
applies to you.
new packager guidelines
2004-07-17 20:55:45 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
Avoid maintaining distribution specific patches. Send your
patches to upstream, where they are at least reviewed, if not
included.
new packager guidelines
2004-07-17 20:55:45 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
Please forward bug reports. If your bug database is public and
busy enough to bother with, please make this known. Follow
Debian's lead in making the bug database easy to comment on via
email without need for an account.
new packager guidelines
2004-07-17 20:55:45 +05:30
For normal packages, ensure that you do not add debugging flags
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
to the CFLAGS variable.
x86-64 sucks
2003-10-23 09:11:58 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
UPSTREAM & BUG REPORTS
Adjusted makefiles for autotools
2002-05-16 06:56:47 +05:30
docs: change README to describe procps-ng project Reference: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/PATCH-Clean-README CC: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
2012-02-25 02:38:12 +05:30
procps-ng <procps@freelists.org>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink