Added pmap -X and -XX tests
The two extra extended pmap options were not tested previously. We test against our known process and process 1 which we should not be able to get data for. Unfortunately, the tests cannot catch SEGSEGVs but they should. Signed-off-by: Craig Small <csmall@enc.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9236b39f32
commit
1f1201f896
1
.gitignore
vendored
1
.gitignore
vendored
@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
||||
*.lo
|
||||
*.o
|
||||
*.so
|
||||
*.swp
|
||||
.deps
|
||||
.libs
|
||||
.version
|
||||
|
@ -5,9 +5,11 @@ set pmap "${topdir}pmap"
|
||||
set mypid [pid]
|
||||
|
||||
set pmap_procname "${mypid}:\\s+\\S+\[^\\r\]+\\s+"
|
||||
set pmap_initname "1:\\s+\\S+\[^\\r\]+\\s+"
|
||||
set pmap_std_header $pmap_procname
|
||||
set pmap_device_header "${pmap_procname}Address\\s+Kbytes\\s+Mode\\s+Offset\\s+Device\\s+Mapping\\s+"
|
||||
set pmap_ext_header "${pmap_procname}Address\\s+Kbytes\\s+RSS\\s+Dirty\\s+Mode\\s+Mapping\\s+"
|
||||
set pmap_generic_header "${pmap_procname}\\s+\(?:\[A-Z\]\[a-z\]+ +\)+"
|
||||
|
||||
set pmap_std_items "\(\[0-9a-f\]+\\s+\\d+K \[rwx-\]{5}\\s+\\S+\[^\\r\]+\\s*\)+"
|
||||
set pmap_device_items "\(\[0-9a-f\]+\\s+\\d+ \[rwx-\]{5}\\s+\[0-9a-f\]+\\s+\[0-9a-f\]{3}:\[0-9a-f\]{5}\\s+\\S+\[^\\r\]+\\s*\)+"
|
||||
@ -47,3 +49,20 @@ set test "pmap extended output"
|
||||
spawn $pmap -x $mypid
|
||||
expect_table $test $pmap_ext_header $pmap_ext_items $pmap_ext_footer
|
||||
|
||||
# -X and -XX have no real format as its dependent on smaps
|
||||
set test "pmap extra extended output"
|
||||
spawn $pmap -X $mypid
|
||||
expect_table $test $pmap_generic_header ".+" "\[= \]+"
|
||||
|
||||
set test "pmap double extra extended output"
|
||||
spawn $pmap -XX $mypid
|
||||
expect_table $test $pmap_generic_header ".+" "\[= \]+"
|
||||
|
||||
set test "pmap X with unreachable process"
|
||||
spawn $pmap -X 1
|
||||
expect_pass $test "$pmap_initname\$"
|
||||
|
||||
set test "pmap XX with unreachable process"
|
||||
spawn $pmap -XX 1
|
||||
expect_pass $test "$pmap_initname\$"
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user