e7585992d9
By co-mingling both external/internal identifiers with actual implementation code, potential future additions to our API would have been considerably more difficult. So, this patch will now rely solely on internal/hidden identifiers serving as fenceposts in validation logic. And if the following convention is used for new fields we will maintain that enumerator alphabetic ordering a a little longer (even though 2 user fields now don't): . PROCPS_PIDS_XTRA_FOO_A, PROCPS_PIDS_XTRA_FOO_B, etc. Reference(s): http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/me-too-newlib,7 Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>