Up until now `xbps-checkvers` would only check for the
real sourcepkg, this broke detection of binary packages
that are subpkgs.
Added a new test case.
Close#192
xbps-rindex(1) has a -r option that sets the remove mode,
due to the changes added to sign repodata we need to access
to the correct directory where repository public keys are
stored. This makes the code use `$PWD/keys` before falling
back to `metadir`.
Fixes the test suite to run with unprivileged users (non root).
In the edge case when an updated package has different (or no)
alternatives groups, make sure to prune those that are in pkgdb
but not in the newly installed package.
A potentially common case of this is when a package that formerly
had alternatives gets removed and a transitional metapackage
takes its place (which has no alternatives).
When the new package has no dependencies, oldest next possible
alternatives group will be used. This is because that indicates
a removed package. When there are dependencies, the newest one
will be used; as this indicates a transitional package.
If set it will continue with the transaction and will
just print what are the conflicting files without returning
EEXIST.
This is a temporary solution for void where there are still
some packages with conflicting files (qt5-host-tools vs qt5-tools-devel).
With input by @duncaen
Always check if there's a new xbps package version available
while *installing* or *updating* in any form.
This fixes the following scenario:
- xbps-0.53_10 is currently installed
- xbps-0.54_1 is available in repo
- xbps-install --update netbsd-wtf || xbps-install new-pkg || xbps-install --update
As expected any of the following scenarios in last cmd will use *this*
transaction to autoupdate xbps and its reverse dependencies.
Another transaction will be necessary to install or update the other unrelated
packages.
Added a new test case to verify this case and improve the other test
cases with more extensive checks.
xbps_get_pkg_fulldeptree() now returns NULL and sets errno to ENODEV
when there are missing dependencies, rather than assert()ing.
Added another test case to check returned error codes.
Signed-off-by: Juan RP <xtraeme@gmail.com>
The current code was failing because while checking for updates
on its reverse dependencies, up-to-date versions were treated
as an error.
Added a new test case to verify that it works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Juan RP <xtraeme@gmail.com>
