From 2fd699497fad3668610d1378986322c84dac8d1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: scuti Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 03:43:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Rewrote explanation for dropped rows. Because the function about excluded rows was changed to show a different key. --- stackoverflow-survey.ipynb | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/stackoverflow-survey.ipynb b/stackoverflow-survey.ipynb index d253e34..ca3b7f3 100644 --- a/stackoverflow-survey.ipynb +++ b/stackoverflow-survey.ipynb @@ -172,15 +172,18 @@ "\n", "### NaNs are dropped\n", "\n", - "No values are assumed in the place of NaN.\n", + "No values are assumed in the place of NaN for keys 'YearsCodePro' and 'ConvertedCompYearly'.\n", "\n", - "Missing values are dropped for developers who:\n", + "Rows with NaN are dropped for developers who:\n", "* did not specify their years of professional experience\n", "* did not disclose an annual compensation.\n", "\n", - "Roughly half of the developers that fit the criteria for analysis (42% for Python, 54% for C) have not specified their annual compensation. This analysis makes no assumptions on the reason. \n", + "More developers declined to specify their income than years of experience. Between total and included rows, the distributions of years of experience is similar. This supports that the analysis is not significantly altered by missing data.\n", "\n", - "The age distribution is similar between those who specified annual compensation and those who declined to do so. This supports that the analysis is not significantly altered by missing data.\n" + "See charts\n", + "\n", + "* Python Developers Total vs Included\n", + "* C Developers Total vs Included" ] }, {