emo/busybox
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix the warning by rewriting the function to be smaller and simpler.

Browse Source 
I'd appreciate somebody on a __BIG_ENDIAN platform testing this out; I haven't
got the hardware...
This commit is contained in:
Rob Landley 2005-09-08 03:22:09 +00:00
parent 658d2cf986
commit 230b411de8
1 changed files with 16 additions and 27 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

43
networking/udhcp/options.c
View File

@ -149,37 +149,26 @@ int add_option_string(uint8_t *optionptr, uint8_t *string)
/* add a one to four byte option to a packet */
int add_simple_option(uint8_t *optionptr, uint8_t code, uint32_t data)
{
char length = 0;
int i;
uint8_t option[2 + 4];
uint8_t *u8;
uint16_t *u16;
uint32_t *u32;
uint32_t aligned;
u8 = (uint8_t *) &aligned;
u16 = (uint16_t *) &aligned;
u32 = &aligned;
struct dhcp_option *dh;
for (i = 0; dhcp_options[i].code; i++)
if (dhcp_options[i].code == code) {
length = option_lengths[dhcp_options[i].flags & TYPE_MASK];
for (dh=dhcp_options; dh->code; dh++) {
if (dh->code == code) {
uint8_t option[6], len;
option[OPT_CODE] = code;
len = option_lengths[dh->flags & TYPE_MASK];
option[OPT_LEN] = len;
if (__BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN)
data <<= 8 * (4 - len);
/* This memcpy is for broken processors which can't
* handle a simple unaligned 32-bit assignment */
memcpy(&option[OPT_DATA], &data, 4);
return add_option_string(optionptr, option);
}
if (!length) {
DEBUG(LOG_ERR, "Could not add option 0x%02x", code);
return 0;
}
option[OPT_CODE] = code;
option[OPT_LEN] = length;
switch (length) {
case 1: *u8 = data; break;
case 2: *u16 = data; break;
case 4: *u32 = data; break;
}
memcpy(option + 2, &aligned, length);
return add_option_string(optionptr, option);
DEBUG(LOG_ERR, "Could not add option 0x%02x", code);
return 0;
}