emo/busybox
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cp: make POSIX-me-harder mode complain with a bit less insane message

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Denis Vlasenko 2007-08-24 14:23:57 +00:00
parent cab774d6e5
commit 3d829627fb
1 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
libbb/copy_file.c
View File

@ -22,25 +22,25 @@
#define DO_POSIX_CP 0 /* 1 - POSIX behavior, 0 - safe behavior */
// errno must be set to relevant value ("why we cannot create dest?")
// for POSIX mode to give reasonable error message
static int ask_and_unlink(const char *dest, int flags)
{
// If !DO_POSIX_CP, act as if -f is always in effect - we don't want
// "'file' exists" msg, we want unlink to be done (silently unless -i
// is also in effect).
// This prevents safe way from asking more questions than POSIX does.
#if DO_POSIX_CP
if (!(flags & (FILEUTILS_FORCE|FILEUTILS_INTERACTIVE))) {
fprintf(stderr, "'%s' exists\n", dest);
// Either it exists, or the *path* doesnt exist
bb_perror_msg("cannot create '%s'", dest);
return -1;
}
#endif
// If !DO_POSIX_CP, act as if -f is always in effect - we don't want
// "cannot create" msg, we want unlink to be done (silently unless -i).
// TODO: maybe we should do it only if ctty is present?
if (flags & FILEUTILS_INTERACTIVE) {
// We would not do POSIX insanity. -i asks,
// then _unlinks_ the offender. Presto.
// (No opening without O_EXCL, no unlinks only if -f)
// (No "opening without O_EXCL", no "unlink only if -f")
// Or else we will end up having 3 open()s!
fprintf(stderr, "%s: overwrite '%s'? ", applet_name, dest);
if (!bb_ask_confirmation())
@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ int copy_file(const char *source, const char *dest, int flags)
) {
// We are lazy here, a bit lax with races...
if (dest_exists) {
errno = EEXIST;
ovr = ask_and_unlink(dest, flags);
if (ovr <= 0)
return ovr;