emo/busybox
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Manousaridis Angelos writes:

Browse Source 
Hello,

I have been using busybox for some time now, for an ARM based platform.
I was very pleased when I tried the 1.00preX series, with all the new
utilities and daemons.

I found out that the ifupdown in busybox does not behave exaclty like
the debian version. Then the pre-up script fails, the interface is
getting up. Also when the post-up script fails the return value is
ignored. Actually everything is always run and the return value is
always true. I looked at the original implementation from debian and
fixed the busybox version to do the same. A patch is attached if anyone
is interested.
This commit is contained in:
Eric Andersen 2003-12-19 10:46:00 +00:00
parent b8d2cd44a6
commit 658f8b1d1a
1 changed files with 8 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
networking/ifupdown.c
View File

@ -1044,24 +1044,22 @@ static int check(char *str) {
static int iface_up(struct interface_defn_t *iface)
{
int result;
if (!iface->method->up(iface,check)) return -1;
set_environ(iface, "start");
result = execute_all(iface, doit, "pre-up");
result += iface->method->up(iface, doit);
result += execute_all(iface, doit, "up");
return(result);
if (!execute_all(iface, doit, "pre-up")) return 0;
if (!iface->method->up(iface, doit)) return 0;
if (!execute_all(iface, doit, "up")) return 0;
return 1;
}
static int iface_down(struct interface_defn_t *iface)
{
int result;
if (!iface->method->down(iface,check)) return -1;
set_environ(iface, "stop");
result = execute_all(iface, doit, "down");
result += iface->method->down(iface, doit);
result += execute_all(iface, doit, "post-down");
return(result);
if (!execute_all(iface, doit, "down")) return 0;
if (!iface->method->down(iface, doit)) return 0;
if (!execute_all(iface, doit, "post-down")) return 0;
return 1;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FEATURE_IFUPDOWN_MAPPING