emo/busybox
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

comment and readme updates

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Denys Vlasenko 2016-11-04 14:13:58 +01:00
parent 79e2598c48
commit 834aba3b72
2 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
libbb/common_bufsiz.c
View File

@ -54,6 +54,15 @@ char bb_common_bufsiz1[COMMON_BUFSIZE] ALIGNED(sizeof(long long));
#else #else
# ifndef setup_common_bufsiz # ifndef setup_common_bufsiz
/* For now, this is never used:
* scripts/generate_BUFSIZ.sh never generates "malloced" bufsiz1:
* enum { COMMON_BUFSIZE = 1024 };
* extern char *const bb_common_bufsiz1;
* void setup_common_bufsiz(void);
* This has proved to be worse than the approach of defining
* larger bb_common_bufsiz1[] array.
*/
/* /*
* It is not defined as a dummy macro. * It is not defined as a dummy macro.
* It means we have to provide this function. * It means we have to provide this function.

2
loginutils/README
View File

@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Getty should establish a new session and process group, and ensure
that tty is a ctty. that tty is a ctty.
??? Should getty ensure that other processes which might have opened ??? Should getty ensure that other processes which might have opened
fds to this tty be dusconnected? agetty has a -R option which makes fds to this tty be disconnected? agetty has a -R option which makes
agetty call vhangup() after tty is opened. (Then agetty opens it again, agetty call vhangup() after tty is opened. (Then agetty opens it again,
since it probably vhangup'ed its own fd too). since it probably vhangup'ed its own fd too).