wget: treat 201,202,203 as success codes too. Closes 9211
This matches "standard" wget. Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d811aaa43c
commit
9ff910de6b
@ -1116,7 +1116,21 @@ static void download_one_url(const char *url)
|
||||
while (gethdr(sfp) != NULL)
|
||||
/* eat all remaining headers */;
|
||||
goto read_response;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Success responses */
|
||||
case 200:
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 201: /* 201 Created */
|
||||
/* "The request has been fulfilled and resulted in a new resource being created" */
|
||||
/* Standard wget is reported to treak this as success */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 202: /* 202 Accepted */
|
||||
/* "The request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has not been completed" */
|
||||
/* Treat as success: fall through */
|
||||
case 203: /* 203 Non-Authoritative Information */
|
||||
/* "Use of this response code is not required and is only appropriate when the response would otherwise be 200 (OK)" */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 204: /* 204 No Content */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Response 204 doesn't say "null file", it says "metadata
|
||||
has changed but data didn't":
|
||||
@ -1141,7 +1155,6 @@ is always terminated by the first empty line after the header fields."
|
||||
However, in real world it was observed that some web servers
|
||||
(e.g. Boa/0.94.14rc21) simply use code 204 when file size is zero.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
case 204:
|
||||
if (G.beg_range != 0) {
|
||||
/* "Range:..." was not honored by the server.
|
||||
* Restart download from the beginning.
|
||||
@ -1149,11 +1162,14 @@ However, in real world it was observed that some web servers
|
||||
reset_beg_range_to_zero();
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* 205 Reset Content ?? what to do on this ?? */
|
||||
|
||||
case 300: /* redirection */
|
||||
case 301:
|
||||
case 302:
|
||||
case 303:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case 206: /* Partial Content */
|
||||
if (G.beg_range != 0)
|
||||
/* "Range:..." worked. Good. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user