tcp/udpsvd: robustify SIGCHLD handling
function old new delta if_verbose_print_connection_status - 40 +40 tcpudpsvd_main 1798 1794 -4 connection_status 31 - -31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 40/-35) Total: 5 bytes Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ac444861b0
commit
d3e1090308
@ -216,17 +216,25 @@ enum {
|
||||
OPT_K = (1 << 16),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void connection_status(void)
|
||||
static void if_verbose_print_connection_status(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* "only 1 client max" desn't need this */
|
||||
if (cmax > 1)
|
||||
bb_error_msg("status %u/%u", cnum, cmax);
|
||||
if (verbose) {
|
||||
/* "only 1 client max" desn't need this */
|
||||
if (cmax > 1)
|
||||
bb_error_msg("status %u/%u", cnum, cmax);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* SIGCHLD handler is reentrancy-safe because SIGCHLD is unmasked
|
||||
* only over accept() or recvfrom() calls, not over memory allocations
|
||||
* or printouts. Do need to save/restore errno in order not to mangle
|
||||
* these syscalls' error code, if any.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void sig_child_handler(int sig UNUSED_PARAM)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int wstat;
|
||||
pid_t pid;
|
||||
int sv_errno = errno;
|
||||
|
||||
while ((pid = wait_any_nohang(&wstat)) > 0) {
|
||||
if (max_per_host)
|
||||
@ -236,8 +244,8 @@ static void sig_child_handler(int sig UNUSED_PARAM)
|
||||
if (verbose)
|
||||
print_waitstat(pid, wstat);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (verbose)
|
||||
connection_status();
|
||||
if_verbose_print_connection_status();
|
||||
errno = sv_errno;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc, char **argv) MAIN_EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE;
|
||||
@ -458,7 +466,7 @@ int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
||||
xconnect(0, &remote.u.sa, sa_len);
|
||||
/* hole? at this point we have no wildcard udp socket...
|
||||
* can this cause clients to get "port unreachable" icmp?
|
||||
* Yup, time window is very small, but it exists (is it?) */
|
||||
* Yup, time window is very small, but it exists (does it?) */
|
||||
/* ..."open new socket", continued */
|
||||
xbind(sock, &lsa->u.sa, sa_len);
|
||||
socket_want_pktinfo(sock);
|
||||
@ -491,8 +499,7 @@ int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
||||
if (pid != 0) {
|
||||
/* Parent */
|
||||
cnum++;
|
||||
if (verbose)
|
||||
connection_status();
|
||||
if_verbose_print_connection_status();
|
||||
if (hccp)
|
||||
hccp->pid = pid;
|
||||
/* clean up changes done by vforked child */
|
||||
@ -586,8 +593,14 @@ int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
||||
|
||||
xdup2(0, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Restore signal handling for the to-be-execed process */
|
||||
signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL); /* this one was SIG_IGNed */
|
||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway */
|
||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway
|
||||
* But we can get signals BEFORE execvp(), this is unlikely
|
||||
* but it would invoke sig_child_handler(), which would
|
||||
* check waitpid(WNOHANG), then print "status N/M" if verbose.
|
||||
* I guess we can live with that possibility.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/*signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);*/
|
||||
sig_unblock(SIGCHLD);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -380,7 +380,10 @@ static void startservice(struct svdir *s)
|
||||
xdup2(logpipe.wr, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway */
|
||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway.
|
||||
* But we can get signals BEFORE execl(), this is unlikely
|
||||
* but wouldn't be good...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/*bb_signals(0
|
||||
+ (1 << SIGCHLD)
|
||||
+ (1 << SIGTERM)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user