clarify that the slab design isn't like jemalloc
This commit is contained in:
parent
c97bbc141c
commit
1b3d485e87
@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ separate region with the memory left non-readable and non-writable.
|
||||
The slab slot count for each size class is not yet finely tuned beyond choosing values avoiding
|
||||
internal fragmentation for slabs (i.e. avoiding wasted space due to page size rounding).
|
||||
|
||||
The choice of size classes is the same as jemalloc:
|
||||
The choice of size classes is the same as jemalloc, but with a much different approach to the
|
||||
slabs containing them:
|
||||
|
||||
> size classes are multiples of the quantum [16], spaced such that there are four size classes for
|
||||
> each doubling in size, which limits internal fragmentation to approximately 20% for all but the
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user