library: rename the 'procps_pids_stacks_sort' function
The above function was the sole public function in the <pids> interface to use the word 'stacks' in its name. All of the others dealt exclusively with their duties, So this commit normalizes that outlier by renaming it. Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c9388ed512
commit
838e7852cb
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ global:
|
||||
procps_pids_ref;
|
||||
procps_pids_reset;
|
||||
procps_pids_select;
|
||||
procps_pids_stacks_sort;
|
||||
procps_pids_sort;
|
||||
procps_pids_unref;
|
||||
procps_slabinfo_new;
|
||||
procps_slabinfo_read;
|
||||
|
@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ PROCPS_EXPORT struct pids_reap *procps_pids_select (
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* procps_pids_stacks_sort():
|
||||
* procps_pids_sort():
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Sort stacks anchored in the passed pids_stack pointers array
|
||||
* based on the designated sort enumerator and specified order.
|
||||
@ -1397,7 +1397,7 @@ PROCPS_EXPORT struct pids_reap *procps_pids_select (
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: all of the stacks must be homogeneous (of equal length and content).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
PROCPS_EXPORT struct pids_stack **procps_pids_stacks_sort (
|
||||
PROCPS_EXPORT struct pids_stack **procps_pids_sort (
|
||||
struct procps_pidsinfo *info,
|
||||
struct pids_stack *stacks[],
|
||||
int numstacked,
|
||||
@ -1435,7 +1435,7 @@ PROCPS_EXPORT struct pids_stack **procps_pids_stacks_sort (
|
||||
|
||||
qsort_r(stacks, numstacked, sizeof(void *), (QSR_t)Item_table[p->item].sortfunc, &parms);
|
||||
return stacks;
|
||||
} // end: procps_pids_stacks_sort
|
||||
} // end: procps_pids_sort
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
PROCPS_EXPORT int procps_pids_unref (
|
||||
|
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ struct pids_reap *procps_pids_select (
|
||||
int maxthese,
|
||||
enum pids_fill_type which);
|
||||
|
||||
struct pids_stack **procps_pids_stacks_sort (
|
||||
struct pids_stack **procps_pids_sort (
|
||||
struct procps_pidsinfo *info,
|
||||
struct pids_stack *stacks[],
|
||||
int numstacked,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user