emo/procps
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Activity

whip me, beat me, make me do UNIX terminal handling

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
albert 2003-03-27 16:28:41 +00:00
parent 0310505e6e
commit 89ccfbf4f8
4 changed files with 12 additions and 57 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
NEWS
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
procps-3.1.8 --> procps-3.1.9
top: fix suspend/resume behavior
procps-3.1.7 --> procps-3.1.8
top: fix keyboard handling (help screen, etc.)

4
proc/sysinfo.c
View File

@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int compare_vm_table_structs(const void *a, const void *b){
// see include/linux/page-flags.h and mm/page_alloc.c
unsigned long vm_nr_dirty; // dirty writable pages
unsigned long vm_nr_writeback; // pages under writeback
unsigned long vm_nr_pagecache; // pages in pagecache
unsigned long vm_nr_pagecache; // pages in pagecache -- gone in 2.5.66+ kernels
unsigned long vm_nr_page_table_pages;// pages used for pagetables
unsigned long vm_nr_reverse_maps; // includes PageDirect
unsigned long vm_nr_mapped; // mapped into pagetables
@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ void vminfo(void){
{"nr_dirty", &vm_nr_dirty}, // page version of meminfo Dirty
{"nr_mapped", &vm_nr_mapped}, // page version of meminfo Mapped
{"nr_page_table_pages", &vm_nr_page_table_pages},// same as meminfo PageTables
{"nr_pagecache", &vm_nr_pagecache},
{"nr_pagecache", &vm_nr_pagecache}, // gone in 2.5.66+ kernels
{"nr_reverse_maps", &vm_nr_reverse_maps}, // page version of meminfo ReverseMaps
{"nr_slab", &vm_nr_slab}, // page version of meminfo Slab
{"nr_writeback", &vm_nr_writeback}, // page version of meminfo Writeback

2
procps.lsm
View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Begin4
Title: procps
Version: 3.1.9
Entered-date: 2003-03-20
Entered-date: 2003-03-27
Description: Linux system utilities
Keywords: procps /proc libproc sysctl pmap ps uptime tload
free w top vmstat watch skill snice kill pgrep pkill

59
top.c
View File

@ -3141,13 +3141,6 @@ static void framehlp (int wix, int max)
* (the CURSOR is STUCK in just the RIGHT place, know what I)
* (mean? Huh, "doesn't DO MUCH"! Never, EVER think or say)
* (THAT about THIS function again, Ok? Good that's better.)
*
* (ps. we ARE the UNEQUALED justification KING of COMMENTS!)
* (No, I don't mean significance/relevance, only alignment.)
*
* (What's that? Are you sure? Old main's REALLY GOOD too?)
* (You say he even JUSTIFIES comments in his FUNCTION BODY?)
* (Jeeze, how COULD I have known? That sob's NOT IN SCOPE!)
*/
static void frame_make (void)
{
@ -3196,30 +3189,10 @@ static void frame_make (void)
}
/*
* Darling, you DO look simply MARVELOUS -- have you been dieting?
* Or maybe it's because YOU and WINDOWS seem such a HAPPY couple.
*
* Of course NO. Not THOSE deathly BLUE WINDOWS! I mean your 'A'
* mode (alt display) windows. Yes, yes those completely OPTIONAL
* ones. We ALL know you'd NEVER FORCE that interface on ANY user
* - unlike You-Know-Who! Well I've got to run. But you're doing
* it just SPLENDIDLY! You go right on doing it EXACTLY the SAME!
*/
int main (int dont_care_argc, char **argv)
{
(void)dont_care_argc;
before(*argv);
/*
Ok, she's gone now. Don't you mind her, she means well but yes, she is
a bit of a busy-body. Always playing the matchmaker role, trying to do
away with unmarried windows and bachelors. So, back to business buddy!
You're hungry, you said? How'd you like a sandwich? No, no, no -- not
the usual slopped together, hacked up illogic. I'm talkin' a carefully
reasoned, artfully crafted, extremely capable, well behaved executable!
Well then, here, try THIS sandwich: */
// +-------------+
windows_stage1(); // top (sic) slice
configs_read(); // > spread etc, <
@ -3261,7 +3234,11 @@ int main (int dont_care_argc, char **argv)
if(file_flags==-1) file_flags=0;
fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK|file_flags);
// check 1st, in case tv zeroed (by sig handler) before it got set
if (chin(0, &c, 1) <= 0) select(1, &fs, NULL, NULL, &tv);
if (chin(0, &c, 1) <= 0) {
fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_SETFL, file_flags);
select(1, &fs, NULL, NULL, &tv);
}
fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK|file_flags);
if (chin(0, &c, 1) > 0) {
fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_SETFL, file_flags);
do_key((unsigned)c);
@ -3271,31 +3248,5 @@ int main (int dont_care_argc, char **argv)
}
}
/*
(listen before we return, aren't you sort of sad for old 'frame_make'?)
(so, uh, why don't we just move this main guy to near the beginning of)
(the C source file. then that poor old function would be sure to have)
(at least a chance at scopin' us out, ya know what i mean? so what do)
(ya think? all things considered, would that be a proper thing to do?)
Now there's an EXCELLENT idea! After all, SOME programmers DO code the
main function ANY OLD PLACE they feel like. And in doing THAT, they're
helping to keep those that FOLLOW out of mischief, busy HUNTING for the
<bleepin'> thing. Further, by moving it we can contribute to PROTOTYPE
PROLIFERATION for every function main calls. Don't you KNOW that those
declarations OFTEN LINGER, usually long AFTER the REAL definitions have
DISAPPEARED, since programs do evolve? Yep that's a GREAT idea you got
there, NICE GOING! But, here's an opposing view: ANYONE who'd put main
ANYWHERE such that its LOCATION cannot be REACHED with JUST 1 KEYSTROKE
better turn in their Coding_Badge and Pocket_Protector then -- BE GONE!
The main function has only ONE proper HOME: always the LAST function in
that C Listing. End-of-Story, No-More-Discussion, so BE QUIET already!
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
Sheeesh, didn't that doofus know the return statement can't be executed
or that we end via a caught signal? Oh Lordy, I is DROWNING in morons!
They done REACHED clear up to my OUTER braces! We's surely DOOMED now!
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
*/
return 0;
}