emo/procps
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Activity

library: also include a 'read' for slabnode_chain_fill

Browse Source 
While meminfo does implement only the singular version
of 'xxxx_chain_fill', it was wrong to limit the 'read'
to the plural version (only) within our new slabs API.

This kind of inconsistency will only spell trouble for
future users of the new libprocps API. So, this commit
will mean that any form of xxxx_chain(s)_fill function
also includes a 'read', whereas xxx_getchain does not.

Reference(s):
commit aab537bc1333b9ca57eaeec073b51af12f9280f8
http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/newlib-interfaces

Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
This commit is contained in:
Jim Warner 2015-07-13 00:00:00 -05:00 committed by Craig Small
parent 74cb6afcc9
commit 9d1073a22a
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
proc/slab.c
View File

@ -565,9 +565,14 @@ PROCPS_EXPORT int procps_slabnode_chain_fill (
struct slabnode_chain *chain,
int nodeid)
{
int rc;
if (info == NULL || chain == NULL || chain->head == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
if ((rc = procps_slabinfo_read(info)) < 0)
return rc;
return procps_slabnode_getchain(info, chain->head, nodeid);
}
@ -609,7 +614,7 @@ PROCPS_EXPORT int procps_slabnode_chains_fill (
for (i = 0; i < maxchains; i++) {
if (chains[i] == NULL)
break;
if ((rc = procps_slabnode_chain_fill(info, chains[i], i) < 0))
if ((rc = procps_slabnode_getchain(info, chains[i]->head, i) < 0))
return rc;
}