emo/procps
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Activity

library: added some justification emphasis, <pids> api

Browse Source 
I almost feel like I should apologize for this kind of
patch ( *almost* ). But, since this comment was unique
to the <pids> api and since it was especially designed
to align with the following comment and since the next
comment already carried the alignment emphasis, I will
refrain from issuing any apology and submit it anyway.

[ plus to prove that i am not totally anal-retentive ]
[ and can exercise some restraint there are two more ]
[ places where i COULD have added alignment emphasis ]

[ see lines 804-806 and lines 1360-1361 for my proof ]

Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
This commit is contained in:
Jim Warner 2020-07-24 10:24:57 -05:00 committed by Craig Small
parent b117b67a52
commit c13ea57495
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
proc/pids.c
View File

@ -1069,9 +1069,9 @@ static int pids_stacks_fetch (
if (!pids_assign_results(info, info->fetch.anchor[n_inuse++], &task))
return -1; // here, errno was set to ENOMEM
}
/* while the possibility is extremely remote, the readproc.c (read_something)
simple_readproc and simple_readtask guys could have encountered this error
in which case they would have returned a NULL, thus ending our while loop. */
/* while the possibility is extremely remote, the readproc.c (read_something) |
simple_readproc and simple_readtask guys could have encountered this error |
in which case they would have returned a NULL, thus ending our while loop. | */
if (errno == ENOMEM)
return -1;